How to structure a review article
The shape most Medical Review submissions take: question, background, evidence, limitations, conclusion. Read this before you start writing.
The shape most Medical Review submissions take: question, background, evidence, limitations, conclusion. Read this before you start writing.
Your abstract is the only part everyone reads. How to fit the question, method, finding and meaning into 250 words.
Boolean operators, MeSH terms and filters. How to turn a vague interest into a search that returns twenty useful papers…
Abstract, figures, methods, discussion — in that order, and what to look for in each. Includes how to skim thirty…
The layout we ask for: title, author details, abstract, body, references. Start here and your submission will need less editing.
PubMed Central, DOAJ, Europe PMC and preprint servers — the places a school student can read the full text for…
Both styles are accepted. Worked examples for journal articles, books, websites and datasets, plus the three mistakes we correct most…
A checklist for the pass you make before submitting: hedge words, unsupported claims, paragraph openings and figure captions.
Study designs ranked, sample size, confounding, and why a large observational study can still be weaker than a small trial.
Not everything indexed is trustworthy. The warning signs, and where to check a journal before you cite it.
p-values, confidence intervals, absolute versus relative risk, and number needed to treat — explained without the maths degree.
For forum day. Ten slides, sized for the hall, with space for one figure per slide.
A Zotero collection set up with the APA and MLA styles we accept, so citations format themselves.
A handful of readable reviews in neuroscience, genetics, public health, oncology, cardiology and ethics to help you find a question.
Autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, with cases. Useful whatever your topic, essential if it involves patients.